Cows in a Pasture
Amy Pajcic, The Ohio State University
Creative Corner, Entry
Amy Pajcic, The Ohio State University
Creative Corner, Entry
Alex Sigmund, University of Georgia
Foot In Mouth, Honorable Mention
So I am by no means a “country boy,” but I also would not consider myself a “city boy” either. I’ve camped, hiked, and ridden horses, but I definitely have not dealt with cattle, sheep, and farming…EVER. With this history, I was incredibly ill prepared for a particular experience I would endure during my first year of veterinary school at UGA.
It was spring semester and that blasted anatomy class was finally over. We actually would get to touch live animals and it smelled and felt so…non-formaldehyde-y. With my sinuses clear, I was ready to learn and be “hands-on” with ruminants for the first time. I definitely did not realize just how “hands-on” I would be. But first off, goats are adorable and sheep are much bigger than they look on the movie Babe. Secondly, cows can squat.
Entry, Abstracts
Carlie Gordon, Washington State University
Background: Visual observation of an arched back in dairy cattle while they are standing and walking is one criterion for assessing lameness through locomotion scoring. However, observation of a back arch while cows are in stanchions is only variably associated with lameness. If the observation of back arch could be better defined, the sensitivity of this method might be improved. It was the purpose of this study to evaluate the degree of back arch that would differentiate lame from non-lame cows while in stanchions and assess if the back arch posture in the lock-up is a predictable observation for lameness.
Methods: Locomotion scores were collected for all lactating Holstein cows on one farm. Cows with scores of two or greater were used for this study. Eighteen cows received a locomotion score of ≥ 3 and 55 cows received a locomotion score of ≤ 2. Digital photographs of these cows while in stanchions and from videos as they exited the milking parlor were taken. Images were analyzed for the degree of back arch, “deviation from flat”, where a flat back was considered 180°. In addition, cows in one pen were observed 5 successive times while stanchioned to evaluate time in lockup effects on the presence of a back arch.
Results: The angle of deviation from cows during lockup was not associated with locomotion score. However, there was a trend for cows that were determined to have a locomotion score of ≥ 3 to have back angles that deviated further from 180 °. From the successive observations, back-arch was not a consistent observation but the proportion of observation time a cow was observed with a back arch was significantly greater for lame cows vs. non lame cows.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that the back arch observation, although inconsistently associated with locomotion scoring, could be used as a simple screening tool by veterinarians and dairy producers if frequent observations are made while the cows are stanchioned.
*Note: An organge paint stick was used to mark the withers and tail-head of each cow, pictures of each cow in lockup were then taken and at a later date a program called vistametrix was used to assess the the angle of each cow’s back